
A Philip Larking poetry book on a Math reference book. Overexposed and thus, burnt. Editing in anger and frustration of losing my photos. Does the anger show?
>=(

Hand....my hand for that matter...taken with fluorescent lighting coming from the left. Only like this photo because of the details. Not really interesting otherwise.
Sigh....staying up the whole night didn't really do me much good. By morning I had three drawings of ridiculous figures which didn't make any sense. This is just one of them. Thought it would make an interesting photograph only because of the pencil tones...or maybe the lack of sleep...
My second weird drawing. It's Pac Man! Thought it looked pretty good with the tones and the lighting. But then again, it could have been the lack of sleep that made me think that.
I was hoping this photo might turn up as something a little eerie but it's failed. Should have increased the brightness and the contrast and NOT sharpened it. It just looks really mundane and tired. The cropping is a little off too =S.
I like this photo only because of the lighting but the angle is a little strange. The lamp looks distorted and the details of the desk are a bit obscure in a way.
I know you can't tell what's going on in this photo (you've probably got the "your photos don't make any sense" face right now) but it's actually a photo taken through spectacles lens. I come up with the weirdest ideas sometimes and this photo just proves what a failure it can be in terms of visual appeal.
The worst photo out of the lot for sure =P. A real failure when it comes to visual appeal. No...this wasn't an attempt at a self-portrait. Was just trying to see how skin tones would come out on the com in RAW and there were no volunteers around so I had to make some sacrifices, unfortunately, at your expense and mine for that matter -_-". Colours, of course, needed some tweeking (which RAW photo doesn't?!). Sharpened it a bit too to tone down on the motion blur which was vaguely visible. I actually wanted to keep the original but after (accidentally) turning it into a sepia, I found the tones slightly better than the coloured ones. I might try out portraiture some time later again. Just got my April issue of DCmag and there were pretty good articles on RAW potraits.
Proof of how distracted I really was with my camera. Study lamp till on and literature book open to some random page while I was clicking away. Putting that aside, this photo went through a little too much editing. Colours are harsh because I got carried away with the colour contrast which in return caused the photo to lose some details especially in the darker bits at the back. But I'm still new at this so improvements will come over time.
This is, in my opinion, the best photo out of the whole lot of mishaps. It's not impressive but it's definitely a lot better than the previous three. Lighting was great but, in colour, the photo seemed a little mismatched so I turned it into a sepia and sharpened it a bit. Looks a hell lot better than the original. Also in RAW by the way. DOF is a little off if you ask me and the position of the specs was a little....mundane...could have tried something a little more intriguing but couldn't come up with anything at that time. Lighting was pretty good.